Anil Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6149 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-105 Year-2020 Thana- TETERHAT District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== 1.

ANIL SINGH Son of Pachchan Singh Resident of Village- Sharma, P.S.- Tetarhat Chowk, District- Lakhisarai.

2.

Nagina Singh @ Lageena Singh Son of Pachchan Singh Resident of VillageSharma, P.S.- Tetarhat Chowk, District- Lakhisarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shashi Bhushan Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Tarkeshwar Nath Thakur, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 01-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 504, 385 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 37(B) (C) of the Bihar Excise Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 29.10.2020 at 9:00 pm while he was in his house along with his family, all the accused persons, including the petitioners, came and Chandan Kumar who was drunk stabbed his son with a knife in his abdomen, it is next alleged that Saurav Kumar armed with pistol started abusing the informant and further demanded extortion of Rs. 25,000/- and on hulla being raised,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6149 of 2022(2) dt.01-07-2022 2/2 villagers gathered and the accused persons fled from the place of occurrence.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that from bare perusal of the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R. it would manifest that accept for the name of the petitioners in the F.I.R. no overt act has been alleged against them.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and the fact that no overt act has been alleged against the petitioner in the F.I.R. and they are persons with clean antecedent, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Tetarhat P.S. Case No. 105 of 2020 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishi/- U T