← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/3063/2019disposed

Reena Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2024-07-23Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3063 of 2019 ====================================================== Reena Kumari Ramdali Das resident of Village- Kehunia, Ward No. 14, Police Station- Pranpur, District- Katihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar and Ors Bihar 2.

The District Magistrate, Katihar.

3.

The District Programme Officer, Katihar.

4.

The Child Development Project Officer, Pranpur, District- Katihar. 5.

Reetu Kumari Resident of Belgachi, Ward No. 2, Police Station- Pranpur, District- Katihar.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Abdul Wadood, Adv.

:

Mr. Bijay Kumar Pandey, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Md. Raishul Haque (SC 10) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 23-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not exhausted the remedy of appeal, therefore, liberty may be given to file appeal before appropriate forum.

3. Counsel for the State raised preliminary objection and submits that the petitioner has demanded his appointment on the post of Anganwari Sevika/Sahayka for Ward No.14, Center No.145 at Kehunia Gram Panchayat, but he has not moved before the original authority instead thereof, he has filed only representation.

Patna High Court CWJC No.3063 of 2019(3) dt.23-07-2024 2/2

4. As such, counsel submits that no remedy could be granted to the petitioner for preferring appeal.

5. Upon hearing the parties and perusal of the documents, it transpires to this Court that the petitioner has filed representation whereas according to relevant Margdarshika Rule for appointment of Anganwari Sevika/Sahayka, he has to file statutory complain and as such, the liberty for preferring appeal could not be granted by this Court. She may exhaust her remedy in the light of relevant Anganwari Guidelines for appointment of Anganwari Sevika/Sahayka.

6. With the aforesaid direction, the present writ application is hereby disposed off.

(Dr. Anshuman, J.) Prakashmani/- U