← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/2409/2019dismissed

Naina Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2022-07-12Mr. Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2409 of 2019 ====================================================== Naina Kumari D/o Indrajeet Badghariya, Resident of Mohalla- Kerai, Ward No. 6, P.S.- Naurangiya, District- West Champaran, at present English Teacher of Rajkiya Jugul Sah Janjati Balika Uccha Viddyalaya Harnatanr, P.S. and P.O.- Harnatanr, District- West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Higher Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Nalanda Open University through Chancellor, Raj Bhawan, Patna. 3.

The Chancellor, Nalanda Open University, Raj Bhawan, Patna. 4.

The Vice Chancellor of Nalanda Open University, Biscoman Bhawan, Gandhi Maidan, Patna.

5.

The Pro- Vice Chancellor of Nalanda Open University Biscoman Bhawan, Gandhi Maidan, Patna.

6.

The Nodal Officer-cum- Registrar of Nalanda Open University, Biscoman Bhawan, Gandhi Maidan, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Subhash Kumar Jha, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Subash Chandra Mishra (Sc16) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA ORAL ORDER 12-07-2022

1. Heard the parties.

2. The petitioner has prayed to allow her to join the counselling as she could not appear for counselling notified on 09.08.2018 since she was notified only by sms on mobile at 11.30 P.M. on 08.08.2018 and is residing about 400 k.m. away. The petitioner had appeared in the B.Ed. Combined Entrance Test 2018 organized by the University. She is from Schedule Tribe category and disabled woman having 70 percent disability.

3. While the Court has all the sympathy for the

Patna High Court CWJC No.2409 of 2019(4) dt.12-07-2022 2/2 petitioner, no relief can be granted to her after efflux of time. The writ petition was filed in 2019 but has remained pending for admission. The selection process for 2018 B.Ed course is complete and thereafter, several courses have already been concluded. This Court cannot turn the clock back finds that the writ petition has therefore become infructuous by efflux of time. Accordingly, the same is dismissed.

(Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J) amit/- Item no.36 U