Sabir Hussain @ Sekh Sabir Hussain v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6742 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-49 Year-2021 Thana- MAHILA PS District- East Champaran ====================================================== SABIR HUSSAIN @ SEKH SABIR HUSSAIN Son of Sheikh Abbas @ Sekh Abbas Resident of Village - Pathanpatti, Police Station - Darpa, District - East Champaran at Motihari.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shashank Shekhar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 22-06-2022 Let the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, be removed within a period of four weeks from today. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 49 of 2021 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498A, 406 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Without going into the merits of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on provisional bail for a period of two months from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order to the court concerned on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6742 of 2022(2) dt.22-06-2022 2/2 Judicial Magistrate, Raxaul, East Champaran at Motihari in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 49 of 2021. The court below is directed to make suitable effort for the purpose of conciliation between the parties and if conciliation is successful, learned court below in a position to confirm the provisional bail.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submit that petitioner is ready to keep his wife with love and affection. If an amicable resolution is worked out within two months, petitioner would be entitled to confirmation of his provisional bail.

If, on the other hand, the issue is not resolved between the parties, the Court below, needless to say, would be well within its jurisdiction to exercise its judicial discretion and pass appropriate orders, which may include cancellation of provisional bail of the petitioner.

Accordingly, this application stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

(Alok Kumar Pandey, J) Gautam/- U T