Niranjan Kumar @ Niranjan Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6036 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1234 Year-2023 Thana- MADHEPURA District- Madhepura ====================================================== Niranjan Kumar @ Niranjan Sah S/O Ravindra Sah R/O Village- Sakarpura, P.S- Madhepura (Bharrahi O.P.), Distt.- Madhepura. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pushkar Narain Sahi, Sr. Adv Ms.Pooja Prasad, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Arun Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 22-04-2026 1.

Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioner, Sri Pushkar Narain Sahi and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Madhepura ( Bharrahi O.P) P.S.Case No. 1234 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27of the Arms Act. 3.

The learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that this is the third attempt of the petitioner to seek regular bail, who is in custody since 22-12-2023.

4.

Learned APP, at the outset, submits that it is a case of triple murder and petitioner had earlier moved before this Court seeking regular bail by filing Cr. Misc No. 52061 of 2024 and the same came to be rejected by an order dated 5-10-2024 after considering the case in details and on merit. It is also submitted

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6036 of 2026(2) dt.22-04-2026 2/2 that from perusal of the order dated 20-6-2025 in Cr. Misc No. 39004 of 2025 by which the second attempt of the petitioner to seek bail was rejected, it appears that the trial had commenced and four witnesses were examined, on which the learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that after 206-2025 only one witness has been examined. 5.

After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, the Court is not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. 6.

Accordingly, the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner is rejected.

7.

However the learned trial court is requested to expedite the trail if possible.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Sumit/- U T