Ramesh Bhagat v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7501 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-53 Year-2013 Thana- GOPALPUR District- Gopalganj ====================================================== 1.

RAMESH BHAGAT Son of Bhikhari Bhagat Resident of Village - Sahpur Pakariyar, P.S.- Gopalpur, Dist.- Gopalganj.

2.

Harendra Sah Son of Nathhu Sah Resident of Village - Sahpur Pakariyar, P.S.- Gopalpur, Dist.- Gopalganj.

3.

Ram Bahadur Sah @ Ram Bahadur Sah@Rambhadadur Sah Son of Gorakh Sah Resident of Village - Sahpur Pakariyar, P.S.- Gopalpur, Dist.- Gopalganj.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shyama Kant Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Mushtaque Alam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 25-02-2020 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Gopalpur P.S. Case No. 53 of 2013, registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 342, 452, 323, 324, 307, 109, 353, 332, 333, 379, 380, 337, 338, 435, 436, 427 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner and large number of others is of assaulting the police party and setting the vehicles on fire. It further appears that the case is of the year 2013 but in spite of that he has appeared on 04.12.2019 and since then they are in custody.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners is that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7501 of 2020(3) dt.25-02-2020 2/2 they have falsely been implicated in this case and the allegation is general in nature. Further submission is that there is marriage in the house of petitioner no. 2.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the conduct of the petitioner, at this stage, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail, however, once the charge is framed, petitioner will be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail.

However, since it has been submitted that there is marriage in the house of petitioner no. 2, he is at liberty to approach the learned Court below with a prayer for provisional bail and the court below shall dispose of his prayer for grant of provisional bail on same day.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunilkumar/- U T