Bablu Paswan @ Bablu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.296 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-40 Year-2024 Thana- BUNIYAD GANJ District- Gaya ====================================================== Bablu Paswan @ Bablu Kumar S/o Shiv Paswan R/o Mohalla - Head Manpur, P.S - Buniyadganj, District - Gaya ... ... Appellant/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar Bihar 2.
Tiger Kumar S/o Late Rajaram Ravidas R/o Mohalla - Head Manpur, Bhim Nagar, P.S - Buniyadganj, District - Gaya ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s :
Mr.Sanjay Kumar For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Usha Kumari 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 01-07-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the State.
2. The present appeal is being preferred for setting aside the order dated 05.01.2026 passed by the Learned Exclusive Special Judge (SC/ST), Gaya Ji in CIS No. Bail Application (Special Act) 4263 of 2025, arising out of Buniyadganj P.S. Case No. 40 of 2024, whereby the prayer for bail of the appellant was rejected, in connection with the case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code, read with Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) and 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and Section 27 of the Arms
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.296 of 2026(3) dt.01-07-2026 2/2 Act.
3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on 25.02.2024, upon hearing the sound of gunfire, the informant rushed to the bank of the Falgu River and allegedly found his brother lying with a gunshot injury while two persons, namely Dularu Sao and Pintu Kumar were seen fleeing from the place of occurrence.
4. During the investigation, the statements of Gopal Das and Raju Das were recorded by the police, in which they stated that the petitioner had shot the deceased. The deceased sustained a gunshot injury. The appellant is in custody since 18.11.2025 and has two criminal antecedents.
5. Considering the nature and gravity of the allegations levelled against the appellant, this Court is not inclined to extend the privilege of regular bail to the appellant.
6. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
(Sandeep Kumar, J) Shishir/- U T