Sri Lal Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9455 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-207 Year-2019 Thana- BIHRA District- Saharsa ====================================================== Sri Lal Yadav, Son of Late Bindeshwari Yadav, Resident of VillageMankhahi, Ward No. -8, P.S.- Bihra, District- Saharsa. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Diwakar Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Pushpa Sinha.1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 25-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner is accused in connection with Special (Excise) Case No. 587 of 2019 arising out of Bihra P.S. Case No. 207 of 2019, registered under Sections 30(a), 38(1) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act, 2016.
The accusation is of recovery of 36 bottles each containing 750 ml, 234 bottles each containing 375 ml and 952 bottles each containing 180 ml Indian made foreign liquor from the rented premises of Niraj Yadav, who succeeded to flee away and the said premises was let out by the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it would appear from the FIR that the alleged bottles of liquor are
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9455 of 2020(2) dt.25-02-2020 2/2 said to be recovered from the house of the petitioner, who was let out to Niraj Yadav. It is further submitted that petitioner is in custody since 01.12.2019.
Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge (Excise Act) at Saharsa, in connection with Special (Excise) Case No. 587 of 2019 arising out of Bihra P.S. Case No. 207 of 2019. Out of two sureties, one surety must be the close relative of the petitioner. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U T