Rinki Devi @ Rinku Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7829 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-431 Year-2025 Thana- BARH District- Patna ====================================================== Rinki Devi @ Rinku Devi W/o Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Yadav R/o Village - Dhakbahachak, P.S - Barh, District - Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Manoj Kumar Pandey, Advocate Ms. Kumari Pallavi, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Parmanand Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-02-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends her arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S..

3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on 08.09.2025 at about 8 AM, Bhaisur (brother-in-law) and Gotni (sister-inlaw) of the informant abused and assaulted her by means of Katta. It is further alleged that when husband of informant came back after attending the call of nature, he tried to rescue the informant but he was also assaulted.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7829 of 2026(2) dt.20-02-2026 2/2 committed no offence. Both parties are agnates and due to dispute with regard to partition of land, this false and concocted case has been lodged. Doctor has found the injuries, allegedly caused by this petitioner, simple in nature.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, relationship between the parties and nature of injuries allegedly caused by these petitioners, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is allowed.

7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ist, District- Patna in connection with Barh P.S. Case No. 431 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S..

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T