M/S Turbotech Infranet Pvt. Ltd. v. The Regional Manager

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2022 of 2022 ====================================================== M/s Turbotech Infranet Pvt. Ltd. M/12- Someshwar Square Near Someshwara, Char Rasta, Vasu, Surat through its Project Head namely Ranjan Kumar (Male), Aged about 44 years, Son of Sri Gajendra Pandey, PanchayatBaijani, Village- Pista Tola, Pista, Block- Jagdishpur, District- Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Regional Manager Union Bank of India, 4th Floor, Nasheman Bhawan, Mazrul Haque Path, Frazer Road, Patna-1.

2.

The Branch Manager, Union Bank of India, Phulwari Sharif Branch, Patna. 3.

Sanjay Kumar Son of Sri Vishwanath Sharma Director, Avighna Enterprises, New Patna Colony, Beur, Police Station- Beur, District- Patna. 4.

Shashi Kant Son of not known to the petitioner Director, Avighna Enterprises, New Patna Colony, Beur, Police Station- Beur, District- Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Harsh Anuj, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Dr. Anand Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date : 21-03-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s). " 1. That this is an application for issuance of Writ(s), order(s) or direction (s) to the Respondents specially the Respondent No.2 to refund the money i.e. amounting to Rs.

40 lacs in the account of Turbotech Infranet Pvt. Ltd. A/c No. 655705503173 which was transferred by the petitioner's firm mistakenly in the account to Avighna Enterprises A/c No. 510101006448259 of Respondents Bank Branch- Phulwari Sharif on 21.12.2021 and 24.12.2021."

Patna High Court CWJC No.2022 of 2022 dt.21-03-2022 2/2 After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to approach the appropriate/competent forum including DRT or consumer forum for redressal of his grievances as permissible in law.

This application is dismissed as withdrawn reserving liberty to the writ petitioner to take recourse to such remedies as are otherwise available in accordance with law. However, it is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and all issues of facts and law are left open.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( S. Kumar, J) veena/rajivAFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date Transmission Date