← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./8322/2023allowed

Niranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2023-03-20Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8322 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-414 Year-2022 Thana- DELHA District- Gaya ====================================================== NIRANJAN KUMAR SON OF MOHAN YADAV R/O CHOTKI DELHA, GUSALKHANA ROAD, P.S.- DELHA, DISTRICT- GAYA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

PRITI KUMARI WIFE OF NIRANJAN KUMAR R/O CHOTKI DELH, GUSALKHANA ROAD, P.S.- DELHA, DISTRICT- GAYA ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anuj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nityanand ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 20-03-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State. The petitioner has prayed for bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 341, 323, 504, 379, 506, 498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 3/4 of the Dowry Act.

As per allegation in the FIR, petitioner along with his family members has tortured in various ways to the informant due to non-fulfillment of further dowry demand and finally they ousted her after snatching her belongings from her matrimonial home.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8322 of 2023(2) dt.20-03-2023 2/2 has submitted that petitioner is husband of the informant and has been falsely implicated in this case. He has neither demanded any thing from the informant nor tortured his wife ever before. In fact, informant does not want to lead matrimonial life with the petitioner. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 5.12.2022.

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Gaya in connection with Delha P.S. Case No. 414 of 2022. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U