Raushan Kumar @ Raushan Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.455 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-264 Year-2017 Thana- NAVINAGAR District- Aurangabad ====================================================== RAUSHAN KUMAR @ RAUSHAN KUMAR SINGH, son of Shiv Bachan Singh, resident of village Kharaundha, P.S. Nabinagar, District Aurangabad ... ... Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Respondent ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s :
Ms.Alka Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Sadanand Paswan, Special P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 07-02-2019 This appeal is for grant of pre-arrest bail to the appellant against the order dated 26.11.2018 passed by Additional Sessions Judge-I-cumSpecial Judge, SC/ST Act, Aurangabad, in A.B.P. filed by the appellant, by which learned Special Judge has rejected prayer for pre-arrest bail of the appellant, who has been made accused in Nabinagar P.S.Case No. 264 of 2017, registered under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3(i)(r)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
Appellant against the appellant is of abusing the informant by taking caste name and there is also allegation of trying to outrage the modesty of the informant.
Submission of learned counsel for the appellant is that as a matter of fact he has disengaged the informant from the harvesting work and due to that the present case has been lodged.
Heard learned Special P.P., who has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.455 of 2019 dt.07-02-2019 2/2 Having heard both sides and in the facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the appellant, rather appellant to surrender and make prayer for regular bail, which shall be considered on its own merit, without being prejudiced by this order and, if possible, to be disposed of on the same day.
With the above observation, this appeal is dismissed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date Transmission Date