Prashuram Singh @ Prashurma Yadav @ Prashuram Yadav @ Parshuram Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13030 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-153 Year-2017 Thana- DINARA District- Rohtas ====================================================== PRASHURAM SINGH @ PRASHURMA YADAV @ PRASHURAM YADAV @ PARSHURAM SINGH Son of Late Ramadhar Singh resident of village-Daluhan,P.S-Dinara, Distt.-Rohtas.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pawan Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Ataur Rahman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-05-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 307, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act.

The prosecution case in short is that after taking meal, while the informant was walking, the accused persons, variously armed, came and shot fire at him due to which he sustained injury and later succumbed to the injury.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 5.9.2018 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. Charge-sheet has been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13030 of 2019(3) dt.10-05-2019 2/2 submitted in the present case. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. There is no substantive evidence to suggest his implication in the present case. On behalf of the State and the informant, it is submitted that the F.I.R. is dying declaration of the deceased. As per F.I.R., the petitioner is one of the assailants. Considering the nature of accusation, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner in connection with Dinara P.S. Case No. 153/2017. The same is rejected. The Trial Court is directed to conclude the trial preferably within one year from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. (Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T