Bibi Majeda And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11709 of 2017 ====================================================== 1.

Bibi Majeda and Anr wife of Md. Murshid Alam 2.

Md. Shamsher Ali son of Md. Dukhan Both are resident of Village - Dabru Tola, Ward No. 05, P.S. - Chausa, District - Madhepura. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Udakishunganj, District - Madhepura. 3.

The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Udakishunganj, District - Madhepura. 4.

The Anchaladhikari, Anchal - Chausa, District - Madhepura. 5.

The Anchal Amin, Anchal - Chausa, District - Madhepura. 6.

Md. Saddam son of Md. Nazir 7.

Md. Ketabul son of Md. Nazam 8.

Md. Naushad son of Md. Shamshu 9.

Md. Shahid son of Iliyas 10.

Md. Munna son of Md. Tajmul 11.

Md. Jubair son of Md. Nazir 12.

Md. Jahani son of Md. Quddus 13.

Md. Siraj son of Md. Ghaghia All resident of Village and P.S. - Chausa, District - Madhepura.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Nafisuzzoha For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Dhurjati Kumar Prasad, GP-14 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 07-07-2025 Heard Mr. Nafisuzzoha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Dhurjati Kumar Prasad, learned GP-14.

2. The instant petition has been preferred for the following relief(s):-

Patna High Court CWJC No.11709 of 2017(3) dt.07-07-2025 2/3 "a) To issue appropriate writ / order / direction in the nature of Mandamus for commanding and directing the respondent No. 4 and 5, the Anchaladhikari, Anchal-Chausa as well as Anchal Amin, Anchal-Chausa, DistrictMadhepura, for recovery of possession of the land in the light of order dated 09.09.2015 passed by the Anchal Amin, Anchal-Chausa in Demarcation (Mapi Vaad) Case No. 16/2014-15, which is pending since long for execution.

b) To issue appropriate writ/order/directions in the nature of Mandamus, for commanding and directing the respondent authorities to give recovery of dispossess land of petitioners, having illegally occupied by the private respondents, upon which the petitioners gave applications.

c) To issue any other appropriate writ or writs under the facts and circumstance of the case, in favour of the petitioner."

3. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioners submit that they shall be approaching the appropriate authority/competent Court for the redressal of their respective grievance.

Patna High Court CWJC No.11709 of 2017(3) dt.07-07-2025 3/3

4. Granting such liberty and without commenting on the merit of the case, the writ petition stands disposed of. Pending I.A.(s), if any, shall also disposed of. (Rajiv Roy, J) Ankit Kumar/- U