Dinesh Kumar Mehta @ Dinesh Mehta v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7034 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-206 Year-2020 Thana- TRIVENIGANJ District- Supaul ====================================================== DINESH KUMAR MEHTA @ DINESH MEHTA S/o Rameshwar Mehta R/o village- Narha Ward No.- 11, P.S.- Tribenganj, District- Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Kamal Kishore Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Umesh Lal Verma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 30-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 144, 149, 341, 323, 308, 379 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on account of dispute relating to grazing of field of Kaleshwar Mehta by the cattle of the informant the occurrence took place in which it is alleged that accused persons, including the petitioner, came and the petitioner assaulted Pawan Yadav and Rubi Devi by farsa causing injury on head and Shrawan Mehta snatched gold
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7034 of 2022(2) dt.30-08-2022 2/3 chain of Rubi Devi and Ashok Mehta snatched Rs. 1500/- from Pawan Yadav.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next alleged that from perusal of allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that for a trivial issue the occurrence took place, it is next submitted that petitioner is not a criminal and even presuming what has been alleged is true without accepting for the purposes of anticipatory bail then the injury suffered by the injured is simple in nature as it has been specifically pleaded at Para-7 of the anticipatory bail application.
Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7034 of 2022(2) dt.30-08-2022 3/3 case is pending/successor court in connection with Tribeniganj P.S. Case No. 206 of 2020 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Shivam/- U T