Rajendra Kumar @ Rabi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10019 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-165 Year-2019 Thana- GOVINDPUR District- Nawada ====================================================== RAJENDRA KUMAR @ RABI Son of Suresh Prasad Verma Resident of Mohalla - Shivpuri, P.S.- Jhumri Tilaiya, District - Koderma (Jharkhand). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pramod Kumar Verma For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Surendra Kumar ====================================================== (The proceedings of the Court are being conducted through Video Conferencing and the Advocates joined the proceedings through Video Conferencing from their residence.) CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 03-06-2020 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Earlier the bail of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 11.12.2019 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 76671 of 2019 with liberty to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. Petitioner seeks bail in Govindpur P.S. Case No. 165 of 2019 registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation is of recovery of 608 litres of illicit liquor from the Bolero Vehicle. Petitioner is the driver of the aforesaid vehicle.

It has been submitted on behalf of petitioner that charge has been framed against the petitioner on 23.12.2019 and petitioner is in custody since 04.09.2019.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10019 of 2020(2) dt.03-06-2020 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and considering the period of custody, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending, in connection with Govindpur P.S. Case No. 165 of 2019, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (4). If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offence, after his release on bail, the trial court shall take steps to cancel his bail bond.

(S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U