Rakesh Kumar Rai @ Rakesh Rai @ Pappu Kumar Rai @ Pappu v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.38192 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -13 Year- 2003 Thana -BEGUSARAI GRP CASE DistrictBEGUSARAI ======================================================
1. Rakesh Kumar Rai @ Rakesh Rai @ Pappu Kumar Rai @ Pappu S/o Late Ramashish Rai, Resident of Village Anandpur Bagha P.S. & Dist. Begusarai.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sada Nand Ray For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pranav Kumar(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 09-09-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner was all along on bail but he left pairvi resulting cancellation of his bail bonds on 26.05.2005 and thereafter, petitioner could be remanded in this case on 24.04.2015 and since then he is languishing in jail custody. The contention on behalf of the petitioner is that petitioner had gone outside the State in connection with his livelihood but his pairvi was left by his advocate clerk as a result thereof, his bail bond was cancelled. Moreover, petitioner was declared absconder on 02.11.2014.
Considering the period of detention of the petitioner
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38192 of 2015 (2) dt.09-09-2015 2/2 in jail custody as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Railway Judicial Magistrate, Barauni, Begusarai in connection with Rail P.S. Case No. 13 of 2003, subject to condition that he shall attend the trial court on each and every date in person for the period of nine months or till conclusion of his trial whichever is earlier and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates without any genuine cause, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.
(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) SHAHZAD/- U T