M. Irfan Ansari And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4650 of 2018 ====================================================== 1.

M. Irfan Ansari, Son of Late Haji Anwar Ali, Resident of Ward No.22, Alam Tola, Forbesganj, P.O. and P.S.- Forbesganj, District- Araria. 2.

Ranju Devi, Wife of Late Vijay Bahadur Singh, Resident of Ward No.16, R.N. Dutta Road, Forbesganj, P.O. and P.S.- Forbesganj, District- Araria. 3.

Amit Kumar, Son of Asok Kumar Sah, Resident of Ward No.17, D.D. Road, Forbsganj, P.O. and P.S.- Forbesganj, District- Araria. 4.

Uma Shankar Yadav, Son of Late Basudeo Prasad Yadav, Resident of Ward No.1, Kali Mela Road, Forbsganj, P.O. and P.S.- Forbesganj, District- Araria. 5.

Chunni Khatoon, Wife of Md. Kuddus Ansari, Resident of Ward No.15, Pokhar Basti, Forbesganj, P.O. and P.S.- Forbesganj, District- Araria. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar, through its Principal Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Executive Officer, Nagar Parishad, Forbesganj, Araria. 3.

Sunita Jain, Chief Councilor, Nagar Parishad, Forbesganj, Araria. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajesh Kumar For the Respondent/s :

Mr. GP-1 Mr. Rakesh Kumar Samrendra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 28-03-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the respondent No.2.

After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioners, it appears that the writ application has been filed in a hurry as till date, no order of punishment has been passed against the employees of the Nagar Parishad.

At this stage, the learned counsel for the petitioners

Patna High Court CWJC No.4650 of 2018(2) dt.28-03-2023 2/2 seeks permission to withdraw the present writ application with a liberty to the petitioners to move afresh, in the event, if any punishment is inflicted or an adverse decision is taken against the petitioners who are employees of the municipality, as it has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have been proceeded against based on a proceeding initiated against them in breach of Section 49 of the Municipal Act.

Permission is accorded.

Accordingly, instant writ application is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U