Md. Kalam v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7624 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-196 Year-2025 Thana- GORAUL District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.
Md. Kalam S/o- Bhola Shah Village- Chhaurahi, P.s-Katahara, Goraul, District- Vaishali 2.
Md. Jabbar S/o- Bhola Shah Village- Chhaurahi, P.s-Katahara, Goraul, District- Vaishali 3.
Bhola Shah S/o- Late Suleman Shah Village- Chhaurahi, P.s-Katahara, Goraul, District- Vaishali 4.
Gulshan Khatoon W/o- Md. Islam Village- Chhaurahi, P.s-Katahara, Goraul, District- Vaishali ... ... Petitioners.
Versus
The State of Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party. ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Ms. Sudha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ram Sumiran Rai, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 04-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest for the offences punishable under Sections 126 (2), 115 (2), 109, 352, 351(2) and 3 (5) of the B.N.S.
3. The allegation in the First Information Report is that the accused persons including the present petitioners indulged in assault and outraging the modesty of the informant.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present case has been lodged on account of an earlier dispute between the parties as the petitioner and the informant are next door neighbours and a case has also been filed on behalf of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7624 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 2/2 petitioner which is earlier in point of time. So far as the injuries are concerned, the same are simple in nature and as such no offence under Section 109 of the I.P.C. can be said to be made out against the petitioners.
5. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that there is case and counter case and the injury sustained by the injured is simple in nature, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/ successor Court in connection with Goraul P.S. Case No.196 of 2025, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the B.N.S.S., subject to the further condition that: (i) The petitioners shall cooperate in the investigation/trial.
(ii) The one of the bailors will be a family member/close relative.
(Soni Shrivastava, J) Trivedi/- U T