Nitish Kumar @ Prince Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11265 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-477 Year-2018 Thana- AGAMKUAN District- Patna ====================================================== Nitish Kumar @ Prince Singh, aged 26 years, male, s/o Hari Nandan Singh Resident of village - Gamhariya P.S.-Harlakhi District-Madhubani, at Present C/O- Ramesh Pd., Mohalla - Indra Nagar, Road No.3, P.S. Jakkanpur DistrictPatna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Praveen Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ganesh Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 04-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 394 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is of snatching gold chain of mother of the informant.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner is in custody since 10.07.2018.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and nature of allegation, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

However, it is observed that the petitioner named

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11265 of 2019(2) dt.04-04-2019 2/2 above be released on bail after completing one year in jail custody upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Agamkuan P.S. Case No. 477/18, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T