Rajendra Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3206 of 2020 ====================================================== 1.
Rajendra Paswan Son of Shri Raghunandan Paswan Resident of Village Umednagar, Police Station Deep Nagar, District Nalanda at Biharsharif. 2.
Ram Ekwal Paswan Son of Rajaram Dass Resident of Village Gauri, Police Station Chandi, District Nalanda at Biharsharif. 3.
Prakash Paswan Son of Late Raghunandan Paswan Resident of Village Nakatpur, Police Station Nalanda, District Nalanda. 4.
Umesh Paswan Son of Madan Paswan Resident of Village Koshu, Police Station Deep Nagar, District Nalanda.
5.
Chandrika Paswan Son of Bajir Paswan Resident of Village Alaudia Sarai, Police Station Manpur, District- Nalanda.
6.
Ram Pravesh Paswan Son of Late Sri Dass Resident of Uprora, Police Station and District Nalanda.
7.
Ram Pukar Paswan Son of Late Lachchu Dass Resident of Alaudia Sarai, Police Station Manpur, District- Nalanda.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary to Government, Public Health Engineering Department, Bisheshwaraiya Bhavan, Bailey Road, Patna.
2.
The Engineer-in-Chief-cum-Special Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Bisheshwaraiya Bhavan, Bailey Road, Patna. 3.
The Chief Engineer (Mechanical), Public Health Engineering Department, Bisheshwaraiya Bhavan, Bailey Road, Patna.
4.
The Superintending Engineer, Public Health Mechanical Circle, Patna, District Patna.
5.
The Executive Engineer, Public Health Mechanical Division, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Lalan Kumar Singh, Adv.
For the Respondent/s :
Mr. S. Raza Ahmad, AAG-5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 01-02-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.
2. After some argument, learned counsel for the
Patna High Court CWJC No. 3206 of 2020(4) dt.01-02-2024 2/2 petitioners submits that the petitioners have filed representation Annexure-7 which has not been disposed of till date.
3. Learned counsel for the State on the other hand submits that the relief(s) demanded by the petitioners are basically a policy matter that whether the petitioners are entitled for C.P.F. or for G.P.F. which cannot be decided at the level of the Executive Engineer and therefore, he may be directed to file fresh representation before the Engineer-in-Chief-cum-Special Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Patna.
4. In this background, the present writ application is disposed of directing the petitioners to file fresh representation before respondent no. 2 within one month from today along with the order passed by this Court and respondent no. 2 is directed to pass a reasoned and speaking order within 90 days thereafter.
(Dr. Anshuman, J.) sadique/- U