Alok Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7914 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-14 Year-2024 Thana- Tetiyabumber District- Munger ====================================================== Alok Yadav S/o Brahamdeo Yadav R/o Village- Kharui, P.S.- Tetia Bamber, District- Munger ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ramchandra Sahni For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 06-03-2025 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State, Shri Chandra Bhushan Prasad. 2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 342, 323, 324, 307, 332, 333, 337, 338, 427, 224, 188 and 186 of the IPC.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of one case and the informant alleges that on secret information that accused are indulging in selling of liquor, the informant reached the place of occurrence and apprehended three accused, who disclosed their names as Alok, Sheonandan and Tuni, but they raised alarm, on which people gathered and attacked the force and taking advantage of the situation, the apprehended accused fled.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7914 of 2025(2) dt.06-03-2025 2/3 4.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that liquor was not recovered from possession of the petitioner. It is also submitted that since petitioner resides at a place nearby to the place of occurrence, as such he came to be implicated. It is also submitted that petitioner will not abscond, rather will cooperate in the investigation to prove his innocence.

5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on Provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Tetiya Bamber P.S. Case No. 14 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. 7.

It is made clear that thereafter the learned Trial Court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7914 of 2025(2) dt.06-03-2025 3/3 event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of more than one case, in that event, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed, but after verification if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of one case, in that event, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) SUMIT/- U T