Gudda Singh @ Manoj Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17014 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-96 Year-2012 Thana- MATIHANI District- Begusarai ====================================================== GUDDA SINGH @ MANOJ SINGH Son of Late Krishna Nandan Singh Resident of Village- Ramdiri Bhawanandpur, P.S.- Matihani, DistrictBegusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Setu Prateek, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Dr. Ajeet Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 27-09-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioner has preferred the instant application for grant of regular bail in a case registered under sections 302, 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act.

As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is stated to have fired hitting the husband of the informant in his chest leading to his death.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the allegations as levelled in the F.I.R. are false and concocted. The petitioner and the deceased happen to be full brothers. The petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case at the instance of coaccused Hareram Singh who is the real

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17014 of 2021(3) dt.27-09-2021 2/2 accused and not the petitioner herein. It is submitted that a number of witnesses have been examined on behalf of of the prosecution in the trial, depositions of which have been brought on record as Annexure-2 series to the petition. From perusal of the deposition of the prosecution witnesses it would transpire that they have not supported the prosecution case against this petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since January, 2020. Heard learned A.P.P. for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the direct allegations against the petitioner in the F.I.R. together with the trial in the learned trial Court having proceeded, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and the application is rejected. Learned trial Court is directed to expedite the trial. (Partha Sarthy, J) Bibhash/- U