Patna High CourtCWJC/7579/2016disposed

Dr. Veena Pandey v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-12-07Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 7579 of 2016 ====================================================== Dr. Veena Pandey Wife of Arun Kumar Pandey, Resident of Flat No. 312, Parasambi Saryug, Vihar Apartment Gosai Tola, Patliputra, Patna- 800013, Bihar.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Health Department, Government of Bihar.

2. The Joint Secretary, Health Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director-in-chief, Administration, Health Department, Government of Bihar.

4. The State Health Education Officer, State Health Education Bureau (State Health Institute of Health and Family Welfare), Government of Bihar, Sheikhpura, Patna.

5. The Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer, Patna.

6. The Director Provident Fund, Pant Bhawan, Patna.

7. The District Provident Fund Officer, Patna.

8. The District Provident Officer, Nalanda.

9. The Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer, Nalanda.

10. The District Provident Fund Officer, Saran (Chhapara).

11. The Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer, Saran (Chhapara).

12. The Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer, Lakhisarai.

13. The District Provident Fund Officer, Lakhisarai.

14. The District Provident Fund Officer, Munger.

15. The District Treasury Officer, Patna.

16. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Dubey, Advocate For the State :

Mr. R. B. Prasad Yadav, A.A.G. 11 Mr. Ramashray Roy, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN

Patna High Court CWJC No.7579 of 2016 (3) dt.07-12-2017 2/2 AMANULLAH ORAL ORDER 07-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; State and Accountant General.

2. In view of materials available on record, the Court is satisfied that all admissible dues of the petitioner have been paid.

3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed off.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) P. Kumar U