← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/1744/2017disposed

Dhanesh Prasad v. Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Managing Director, Bihar State Food And Civil Supplies Corporation, Ltd. And ORS

2018-03-21Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1744 of 2017 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3374 of 2013 ====================================================== Dhanesh Prasad, son of Late Ambika Prasad, resident of Flat No.102, Vindhya Ambika Apartment, Manas Marg, Road No.2, Shiopuri West, P.S.- S.K. Puri, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

1. Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Managing Director, Bihar State Food & Civil Supplies Corporation, Ltd., Khadya Bhawan, Patna-1.

2. Mr. Vinay Kumar Choubey, Chairman cum Managing Director Jharkhand State Food & Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd., Ranchi.

3. Mr. Sadak Anwar, District Manager, State Food & Civil Supplies Corporation Dhanbad Dist- Dhanbad, Jharkhand.

... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Amrendra Narayan Rai, Advocate Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the OP No.1 :

Mr. Nirmal Kumar, Advocate For the OP Nos. 2 & 3 :

Mr. Dhruba Mukherjee, Senior Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER 21-03-2018 In view of the position emerging from the show cause filed on behalf of the Jharkhand State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation and the payment already made to the petitioner, there is major compliance. The Corporation is directed to ensure that the issue relating to arrears of employees provident fund, which has already been calculated, must be forwarded to the concerned Employees Provident Fund authority so that the petitioner can derive the benefit of withdrawal by following the process.

It is made clear that the compliance, which has been made by the Corporation, is in terms of the direction issued by this

Patna High Court MJC No.1744 of 2017(3) dt.21-03-2018 2/2 Court and not on the basis of question of law adjudicated with regard to the obligation of the Corporation and the period for which they have obligation.

Contempt application stands disposed off.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) Pawan/- U