Birendra Ray @ Virendra Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6450 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-988 Year-2021 Thana- MADHEPURA District- Madhepura ====================================================== BIRENDRA RAY @ VIRENDRA RAI Son of Late Ramu Ray R/v- Kewat Tola, Ward No. 10, P.S. and District- Madhepura ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shailendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pronoti Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 15-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 304(B), 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

The allegation against the petitioner along with others is of killing the daughter of the informant, due to nonfulfillment of further dowry demand. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case due to dirty village politics. He has committed no offence. Petitioner is the husband of the deceased. There is no any prior complaint regarding assaulting, harassment and torturing to the deceased

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6450 of 2023(3) dt.15-05-2023 2/2 against the petitioner and others. He submitted that the deceased was a short temper lady, after marriage she always pressurized her husband to leave his parents and take his share of property and shift to her Maike and when her husband did not ready to do so. Due to that reason, the deceased herself committed suicide. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail petition. He is languishing in judicial custody since 15.06.2022.

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura in connection with Madhepura P.S. Case No. 988 of 2021.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) arish/- U T