Sri Kishun Kumar Ray v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5105 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-72 Year-2019 Thana- DHANGAI District- Bhojpur ====================================================== SRI KISHUN KUMAR RAY Son of Ram Nath Ray @ Raam Nath Ray Resident of Village - Nausetandh, Mathiya, P.S. - Bihiya, District - Bhojpur at Ara.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Prabhat Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Veena Rani Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 28-02-2020 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Dhangai P.S. Case No. 72 of 2019, registered for offences punishable under Sections 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Prosecution case is that while the informant was coming with cash of Rs. 78450/- three unknown motorcycle borne miscreants appeared and snatched away his bag containing cash as well as snatched away the key of his motorcycle and fled away. It appears that petitioner is not named in the F.I.R., later on his name transpired on the C.D.R. details, which showed the presence of petitioner near the place of occurrence and later on petitioner was arrested and there was recovery of Rs. 12,000/- from him.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5105 of 2020(4) dt.28-02-2020 2/2 has falsely been implicated in this case only on suspicion and the money, which has been recovered from him is his money. Further he has no criminal antecedent and he has been in custody since 01.12.2019.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the allegation, at this stage, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail, however, the trial court is directed to expedite and conclude the trial within six months and if the trial is not concluded within the aforesaid period, petitioner will be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail.

This application is accordingly dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunilkumar/- U T