Amardeep Verma v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4816 of 2018 =========================================================== Amardeep Verma, son of Sri Balkrishna Lal Das, resident of village Nirmali Ward No. 5, Post + Police Station Nirmali, District Supaul .... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Director, Mid-Day Meal Scheme, Department of Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
3. The District Magistrate, Supaul-cum-Chairman, District Mid-Day Meal Scheme Committee, District Supaul.
4. The District Education Officer, Supaul.
5. The District Programme Officer, Mid Day Meal Scheme, Supaul.
6. The District Co-Ordinator, Mid Day Meal Scheme, Supaul.
7. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Nirmali, District Supaul.
8. Pramod Kumar Yadav, son of Anant Prasad Yadav, resident of village and Post Kupaha, Police Station Radhopur, District Supaul .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Roy For the Respondents : Mr. Prabhakar Jha- GP27 For Mid-Day Meal : Mr. Girijesh Kumar, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 30-03-2018 The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the order issued under the signature of respondent no. 3 vide memo no. 91 dated 03.02.2018 (Annexure-1) by which, pursuant to a decision of Mid-Day Meal Scheme Committee, District Supaul dated 03.02.2018, petitioner' tender for lifting the rice from the godown of State Food Corporation has been declared ineligible; and for connected reliefs.
2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it will suffice if the petitioner's representation dated 24.01.2018 (Annexure-5) filed before the Director, Mid-Day Meal
Patna High Court CWJC No.4816 of 2018 dt.30-03-2018 2/2 Scheme, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna (respondent no. 2) is directed to be disposed of, in which event, the present writ petition need not be pressed on merits.
3. Learned counsel for the State appears and has been heard.
4. Having regard to the nature of the grievances and the stand of the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Director, Mid-Day Meal Scheme, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna (respondent no. 2) to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 24.01.2018 (Annexure-5), if the same is still pending before him, after grant of opportunity of hearing to the petitioner in accordance with law expeditiously and preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this judgment. (Vikash Jain, J) B.T/Ibrar AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A.
Uploading Date 03.04.2018 Transmission Date N.A.