← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./4304/2020bail granted

Neeraj Kumar @ Neeraj Kumar Gupta v. The State Of Bihar

2020-09-08Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4304 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-92 Year-2017 Thana- NAWADA MUFFASIL District- Nawada ====================================================== NEERAJ KUMAR @ NEERAJ KUMAR GUPTA Son of Munna Saw Resident of Mohalla Ram Janki Path, P.S. Parsa Bazar, District - Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Arun Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-09-2020 Due to COVID-19 Pandemic, the matter is being taken up by way of virtual Court proceeding.

The matter has been listed under the heading "For Orders" under the orders of Hon'ble the Chief Justice. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section-30(a) of the Bihar Excise Prohibition Act. The prosecution case, in short, is that 220 liters wine is recovered.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The name of the petitioner has transpired in this case as the petitioner is said to be owner of the car, in question. Except for this, there is no other

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4304 of 2020(5) dt.08-09-2020 2/2 substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. It is alleged that 220 liters wine is recovered from the car, in question. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the nature of goods, being kept in the car. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise, Nawada in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 92 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Sudhir Singh, J) A.K.V.//- U T