Patna High CourtCWJC/13594/2017dismissed

Sakaldeep Rai v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-11-29The Chief Justice,Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13594 of 2017 ====================================================== Sakaldeep Rai, Son of late Ram Baran Rai, Resident of Village- Simra, P.S. Sakara, District- Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Food Consumer and Protection Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Divisional Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur.

3. The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur.

4. The Sub Divisional Officer, East, Muzaffarpur.

5. The District Supply Officer, Muzaffarpur.

6. The Block Development Officer, Sakara( Muzaffarpur).

7. The Block Supply Officer, Sakara Muzaffarpur.

8. Ainul Haque

9. Manul Haque Both Sons of late Asin Mina, Both Resident of Village- Simra, P.S. Sakara, District- Muzaffarpur.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. S. Jamil Akhtar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. S. Raza Ahmad - AAG 5 Mr. Alok Ranjan, AC to AAG 5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 29-11-2017 Keeping in view the fact that the issue raised by the petitioner has already been considered by the competent authority for redrassal of public grievance and vide order dated 05.11.2016, Annexure-8, the said authority did not find any merit in the complaint of the petitioner and thereafter the appeal filed by the petitioner to the appellate authority has already been rejected as is evident from order dated 10.02.2017, Annexure-9, we are not inclined to interfere into the matter now again at the

Patna High Court CWJC No.13594 of 2017(2) dt.29-11-2017 2/2 instance of the petitioner in a public interest litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution as the authorities dealing with the matter on enquiry have found no merit in the matter. Accordingly, finding no merit, the application is dismissed. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) ( Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Sunil/- U