Haidar Ansari @ Md. Haidar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6196 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-398 Year-2025 Thana- SIRDALA District- Nawada ====================================================== Haidar Ansari @ Md. Haidar S/o- Md. Hakim Ansari @ Md. Hasim Ansari Village- Bhelwatand, P.S. - Sirdalla, Dist- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms. Pushpa Sinha.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY ORAL ORDER 04-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in connection with Sirdalla P.S. Case No. 398 of 2025 instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109, 303(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
3. The prosecution case is to the effect that the informant along with his brother were going on a motorcycle and it is alleged that all the FIR named accused persons including the petitioner suddenly assaulted them by means of lathi and danda. It is further alleged that the brother of the informant received head injuries and the accused persons also fled away taking a bag containing Rs. 1,65,000/-. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6196 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 2/3 and has falsely been implicated and no such occurrence as alleged had taken place. It has further been submitted that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner rather general and omnibus allegations have been levelled against 11 accused persons including the petitioner. It is submitted that two injuries were found on the head of the injured, however there is no specific averment with regard to who has caused the aforesaid injuries. Lastly, it has been submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.
4. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.
5. Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, on his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate- 1st Class, Nawada in connection with Sirdalla P.S. Case No. 398 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 of the BNSS and subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6196 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 3/3 petitioner;
(ii) the petitioner will remain present on each and every date fixed by the Court below, if so required by the learned Trial Court;
(iii) in case of absence on two consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bonds of the petitioner will liable to be cancelled by the Court concerned; (iv) the Court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of the same on in the name of verification.
6. It is made clear that the observations, if any, made in this order, shall be of no bearing during the trial. (Sourendra Pandey, J) krishna/- U T