Sanat Kumar Singh @ Jatta v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6034 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-314 Year-2019 Thana- SULTANGANJ DistrictBhagalpur ====================================================== SANAT KUMAR SINGH @ JATTA Son of Ganesh Prasad Singh Resident of Village - Tilakpur, P.S.- Sultanganj, Distt - Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Arbind Kumar, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s:

Mr. Rajendra Nath Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 02-03-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 341, 323, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Sultanganj P.S. Case No. 314 of 2019.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the backdrop of land dispute. In any event it is submitted that no overt act has been attributed to the petitioner and specific allegation of assault has been made against other coaccused. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioner's arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6034 of 2020(2) dt.02-03-2020 2/2 petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur in connection with Sultanganj P.S. Case No. 314 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438

(2) Cr.P.C., and also subject to the following further conditions - (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Ibrar//- U T