Fulo Devi And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.6285 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-169 Year-2018 Thana- JALALGARH District- Purnia ======================================================

1. Fulo Devi, aged about 45 years, female, Wife of Birendra Yadav.

2. Birendra Yadav, aged about 50 years, Male, Son of Late Kartik Lal Yadav.

3. Ajay Kumar Yadav, aged about 22 years, Male, Son of Birendra Yadav.

4. Vijay Kumar Yadav, aged about 20 years, Male, Son of Birendra Yadav All Resident of Village - Hafania, P.S.- Jalalgarh, District - Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ram Prawesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rana Randhir Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 05-02-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Jalalgarh P.S. Case No. 169 of 2018 registered for offences under sections 304(B), 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

In the present case, the victim lady has died on account of her illness on 29.8.2018 at Ishwardayal Memorial Hospital, Patna which was a natural death.

Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6285 of 2019(2) dt.05-02-2019 2/2 Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Purnea in connection with Jalalgarh P.S. Case No. 169 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. as also subject to condition that whenever the police will call the petitioners for investigation/interrogation, they will remain present and if they would not present themselves, the privilege of grant of anticipatory bail shall be deemed to have been canceled. (Shivaji Pandey, J) rishi/- U T