Uday Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16884 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-504 Year-2020 Thana- HAJIPUR SADAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== UDAY KUMAR Son of Sanjay Rai Resident of Village - Madarpur, Subhai, P.S.- Ganga Bridge, Distt.- Vaishali.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kanchan Kumari For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pranav Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 06-01-2022 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State.

Petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Hajipur Sadar P.S. Case No. 504 of 2020 registered for the offence punishable under section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The vehicle which has been seized does not belongs to this petitioner as he has already sold the vehicle but registration could not be done. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16884 of 2021(2) dt.06-01-2022 2/2 Learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that petitioner is the owner of the vehicle which has been seized and as such the anticipatory bail application is itself not maintainable. Considering the nature of allegations levelled, the materials available on record and the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties, this Court does not find it to be a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The same is, therefore, rejected.

(Arvind Srivastava, J) mcv/- U T