Din Dayal Raut v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5376 of 2016 ====================================================== Din Dayal Raut son of Late Shambhu Raut, Resident of village- Sheohar, Ward No. 14, P.S.- Sheohar, District- Sheohar .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Principal Secretary, Education, Bihar, Patna

3. The Director, Secondary Education, Bihar, Patna

4. The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Tirhut, Muzaffarpur

5. The District Education Officer, Sheohar

6. The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Sheohar null null

7. The District Treasury Officer, Sheohar

8. The Headmaster (Incharge), Project Girls High School, Sheohar .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Madhukar Mishra, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Roy Shivajee Nath, AAG-3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 30-10-2018 Heard.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied in case he is granted a liberty to file representation before the respondent no.5 and the respondent no.5 may be directed to dispose of the representation of the petitioner within a specified time frame.

Accordingly, it is directed that the petitioner shall file a representation before the respondent no.5 regarding his grievances raised in the writ petition within a period of two weeks from today and the respondent no.5 is directed to dispose of the same within a period of eight weeks thereafter. The writ petition is disposed of on the aforesaid terms.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) BTiwary/- U