Md. Riazul v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6292 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-190 Year-2025 Thana- Lakho District- Begusarai ====================================================== Md. Riazul S/o Md. Israfil R/o Village - Nawtolia, Ward No.11, P.S - Lakho, District - Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Braj Bhusan Poddar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shyameshwar Dayal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 30-04-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 329(4), 126(2), 115(2), 74, 288, 109, 352, 351(2), 61(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 11.09.2025 at 7.00 A.M., nine accused persons including the petitioner entered his house and assaulted his family members including his mother and sister. Further, petitioner assaulted his younger brother by butt of pistol causing injury on head and also fired. It is next alleged that accused persons in order to establish their dominance had planned to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6292 of 2026(2) dt.30-04-2026 2/3 commit the occurrence with the help of other gang members.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that no doubt it is alleged that petitioner also fired but then no one was injured in the firing nor the FIR has been instituted under the Arms Act. It is further submitted that informant alleges that accused persons in order to establish their dominance had planned to commit the occurrence with the help of other gang members, but then petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and from the side of the petitioner also, Lakho P. S. Case No.191 of 2025 was instituted against the informant and his side. It is also submitted that even injury suffered by the injured has been opined to be simple in nature and the blow is not alleged to be repeated. It is reiterated and submitted that allegation of assaulting by butt of pistol stands falsified by the reason that FIR has not been instituted under the Arms Act.

5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6292 of 2026(2) dt.30-04-2026 3/3 within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Lakho P. S. Case No.190 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T