← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./6283/2019bail granted

Raushan Kumar @ Raushan Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2019-04-10Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6283 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-187 Year-2018 Thana- HAJIPUR SADAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== RAUSHAN KUMAR @ RAUSHAN KUMAR SINGH, son of Narendra Kumar Singh Resident of Village-Dighi Kalan East, P.S.- Hajipur (Sadar), Dist.- Vaishali, ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. N.K. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Prakash Chandra Agrawal For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Naresh Ray ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 307, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act.

The prosecution case in short is that while the informant was returning to his house, the accused persons fired on him due to which he received injury.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 17.9.2018. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. Charge-sheet has been submitted in the present case. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6283 of 2019(5) dt.10-04-2019 2/2 The allegations made in the F.I.R. is denied by the petitioner. The occurrence is said to have taken place in the night. The source of identification has not been disclosed. It is further submitted that the petitioner may be released after completion of one year in custody. The petitioner further submits that he will cooperate during the trial.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R. The petitioner is alleged to have fired upon the victim.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is directed that after completion of one year in custody, the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Hajipur (Sadar) P.S. Case No. 187 of 2018.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T