Ranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6615 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-529 Year-2021 Thana- ARA NAWADA District- Bhojpur ====================================================== RANJAN KUMAR SON OF NARAD YADAV R/O VILLAGEGANGAHAR, P.S.- ARA- MUFFASIL, DISTRICT- BHOJPUR ... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Amarendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Madhuri Lata ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 24-08-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within one month.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Ara Nawada P.S. Case No. 529 of 2021, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 379 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is a person of clean antecedent and his name has figured in confessional statement of co-accused. The stolen motorcycle was not recovered from his possession rather it was
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6615 of 2022(2) dt.24-08-2022 2/2 recovered from the possession of co-accused.
Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender within four weeks before the learned court below, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhojpur, Ara in connection with Nawada P.S. Case No. 529 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. If it comes to the notice of the learned court below that the petitioner is also engaged in any other case except the present one, the learned court below shall be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.
Office shall ensure that all defects are removed by the petitioner within the stipulated time provided in para-1 hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.
(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) SONALI/- U T