Amit Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.205 of 2018 ====================================================== Amit Kumar Singh, son of Mahendra Singh, resident of Village-Siyari, P.S.- Konch, District-Gaya.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Excise Prohibition & Registration Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Collector-cum-District Magistrate, District-Gaya.
3. The Superintendent of Excise, Gaya, District-Gaya.
4. The Superintendent of Police, Gaya, District-Gaya.
5. The Officer-Incharge, Barachatti, P.S. Barachatti, District-Gaya. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ajay Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Manish Dhari Singh, AC to AG ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 04-01-2018 This writ petition has been filed for release of a vehicle (Tempo Black Colour Old) bearing Registration No. BR-02AA 5184, which has been seized in connection with Barachatti P. S. Case No. 660 of 2017 due to violation of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. The prayer made in the writ petition is to release the vehicle in question pending finalization of the confiscation proceedings and criminal case.
It is common ground that in various cases, identical in nature, pending finalization of the confiscation proceedings vehicles have been directed to be released by this Court on various conditions and we see no reason to make a deviation in
Patna High Court CWJC No.205 of 2018(2) dt.04-01-2018 2/2 the present case.
Keeping in view the aforesaid, it is directed that pending finalization of the confiscation proceedings and criminal case, the aforesaid vehicle in question shall be released to the petitioner on his furnishing Bank Guarantee to the satisfaction of District Magistrate, Gaya within a period of one week from the date of his furnishing the Bank Guarantee and further undertaking to produce the vehicle as and when directed by the District Magistrate, Gaya and not to alienate or deal with the vehicle in question during the pendency of the confiscation proceedings and criminal case so as to cause adverse effect or prejudice to the State Government.
With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands allowed and disposed of.
(Rajendra Menon, CJ) ( Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Sunil/- U