Chotu Yadav @ Prince Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6599 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-325 Year-2021 Thana- BIHIA District- Bhojpur ====================================================== CHOTU YADAV @ PRINCE YADAV Son of Krishna Yadav R/o VillageBandha, P.S.- Bihiyan, Distt.- Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Mithilesh Kumar Rai, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Raj Ballabh Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 13-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within four weeks of resumption of normal court proceedings. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within stipulated period, office will place the matter before the Bench. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act.
Allegedly, the petitioner has fired upon the informant, which hit on the thigh of the informant.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. No such occurrence, in
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6599 of 2022(3) dt.13-07-2022 2/2 the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. No independent witness has supported the prosecution case. It is submitted that the petitioner is a bright student and in support of this contention his mark sheet has been enclosed at Annexure-2. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent..
Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, since there is specific allegation upon the petitioner, I am not inclined to enlarge him on bail. The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on his behalf is hereby rejected. This application is accordingly dismissed.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T