Patna High CourtCWJC/11662/2017dismissed

Arvind Kumar v. The Union Of India And ORS

2017-09-12Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad,Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11662 of 2017 ========================================================== Arvind Kumar, S/o Ram Chandar Raut, Resident of Sita Saran Lane, Mithapur, P.O.- G.P.O., P.S.- Jakkanpur, Distt.- Patna. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The Union of India, through Controller of Auditor General of India, New Delhi.

2. The Principal Director of Audit (Rail) East Central Railway Zonal Office Hajipur.

3. The Deputy Director of Audit (Rail) East Central Railway Zonal Office, Hajipur.

4. The Senior Audit Officer (Admn) (Rail), Office of the Principal Director of Audit East Central Railway Zonal Office Hajipur.

5. The Audit Officer (Construction), East Central Railway, Biscomaun Bhawan 5th Floor, Patna.

.... .... Respondents ========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mahendra Thakur, Advocate Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Arun Kumar Arun, Advocate Ms. Subuhi, Advocate ========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI And HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI) Date: 12-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.

Perused the order dated 14.07.2017 passed by Central Administrative Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the "Tribunal"), Patna Bench, Patna in O.A. No. 581 of 2015.

Patna High Court CWJC No.11662 of 2017 dt.12-09-2017 The Tribunal after evaluating the so-called certificate which was produced by the petitioner showing that he had qualified the matriculation examination found such certificate not obtained from a recognized Board or Institution. If the necessary qualification which was mandatory to be obtained within a period of two years was not obtained and some kind of counterfeit degree was tried to be passed off as qualification, then, the respondent authorities have rightly removed him from service and the Tribunal rightly refused to interfere with such decision.

The Writ Application is dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.) (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J.) Rajeev/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 13.09.2017 Transmission Date NA