← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/3887/2018withdrawn

Gunjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-03-14Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3887 of 2018 ====================================================== Gunjan Kumar, Son of Shri Chandeshwar ram, Resident of Indrapuri Colony, Asiyana Nagar, H.No.37, P.O. B.V. College, P.S.-Shastri Nagar, District-Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Energy Department,, State of Bihar.

2. The Chairman, North Bihar State Power Holding Cor. Ltd., Bailey Road, Patna.

3. The Managing Director, North, Bihar State Power Holding Cor. Ltd., Bailey Road, Patna.

4. THe Assistant Electrical Engineer, Electric Supply Division, Farbisganj.

5. THe Electric Superintending Engineer, Purnea, District-Purnea.

6. The General Manager-Cum-Chief Engineer, Kosi Electric Supply Area, Saharsa, District-saharsa.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Surendra Kumar Mishra, Adv. For the Respondent-State: : Mr. Zaki Harden, AC to SC 9 For the Respondent No. 2 to 5 : Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr.Akhileshwar Singh, Adv.

Mr. Vijay Kr. Verma, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 14-03-2018 The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to file an appeal before the appellate authority against the order of the Secretary imposing punishment of dismissal vide order dated 17.1.2013. It is accordingly directed that in case the petitioner files an appeal before the appellate authority within a period of four weeks from today, the same shall be disposed of within a period of four weeks thereafter by a reasoned and speaking order,

Patna High Court CWJC No.3887 of 2018 (2) dt.14-03-2018 2/2 after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner herein as also considering the fact that the order of dismissal obvious to have been passed without considering the reply of the petitioner. The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn on the aforesaid terms.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) BTiwary/- U