Dhaneshwar Yadav @ Dhneshvar Yadav, v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.237 of 2020 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21824 of 2012 ====================================================== Dhaneshwar Yadav @ Dhneshvar Yadav, Son of Late Shital Yadav, Resident of Chandi Sthaqn, Jamhra, Ward No. 12, P.O.-BIratpur, P.S.-Sonbarsa, District-Saharsa, Retd. Assistant Teacher, Primary School, Butaha, P.S.- Sonbarsa, District-Saharsa ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna, namely Sri R.K. Mahajan. 2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna, namely Sri R.K. Mahajan.

3.

The Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna, namely Sri Arbind Kumar Verma.

4.

The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Saharsa, namely Md. Taslimuddin.

5.

The District Education Officer, Saharsa, namely Sri Jai Shankar Prasad Thakur.

6.

The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Saharsa, namely Sri Rahul Chandra.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pramod Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey, AAG-15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 12-03-2026 Heard the parties.

2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s):

"for initiation of civil contempt against the Contemnors/Opposite Parties, in particularly, the Contemnor/Opposite Party No.6, the District Programme Officer (Establishment), Saharsa for

Patna High Court MJC No.237 of 2020(3) dt.12-03-2026 2/2 committing their willful disobedience and deliberate violation of order dated 01.08.2018 passed by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Upadhyay in C.W.J.C. No. 21824 of 2012 (Dhaneshwar Yadav Vs. The State of Bihar and others) as the same has not been complied with in its letter and spirit till date."

3. A show cause has on behalf of the District Programme Officer (Establishment), Saharsa, according to which, the claim of the petitioner has been rejected.

4. Granting liberty to the petitioner to challenge the same, MJC No. 237 of 2020 stands disposed of. (Rajiv Roy, J) Adnan/- U