← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./6803/2023bail granted

Ranjeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2023-04-20Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6803 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-13 Year-2022 Thana- MORO District- Darbhanga ====================================================== RANJEET KUMAR Son of Rajnarayan Singh Resident of Village - Ladaura Dargah, P.S.- Kalyanpur, District - Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vinay Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mritunjay Kumar Nirala, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-04-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

The prosecution case, in short, is that 3585 liters wine is recovered.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. It is alleged that 3585 liters wine is recovered from different vehicles. The name of the petitioner has transpired as being owner of the pick up van in question. The same is run as public carrier by the driver of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the nature of goods booked by the transporter. Rest of the vehicles do not belong to the petitioner. Except for this, there is no other substantive

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6803 of 2023(2) dt.20-04-2023 2/2 evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon the order dated 13.04.2022 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Criminal Appeal No. 626 of 2022 (Sweta Kumari versus State of Bihar).

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R./complaint case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge-2nd Excise Act, Darbhanga in connection with Moro P.S. case No. 13 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T