Raj Kumar @ Raj Kumar Bhuiyan @ Raj Kumar Rikiyasan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7329 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-520 Year-2023 Thana- MADANPUR District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Raj Kumar @ Raj Kumar Bhuiyan @ Raj Kumar Rikiyasan Son of Arjun Bhuiyan village- Nawadih, Ps- Madanpur, Dist- Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Aman Vishal, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Satya Nand Shukla, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER 28-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Madanpur P.S. Case No. 520 of 2023, dated 29.11.2023 instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 307, 302, 379, 325 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Prayer of the petitioner for bail was earlier rejected by this Court vide order dated 05.07.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 35810 of 2024.
4. This is the second attempt for grant of bail by the petitioner. Save and except period of custody, nothing has changed and no fresh ground is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner for enlarging the petitioner on bail.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7329 of 2025(3) dt.28-02-2025 2/2
5. Since there is a specific allegation against the petitioner of assaulting the father of informant with tangi on his head as a result of which he died, I am not inclined to reconsider the prayer for bail.
6. The learned trial Court is directed to take all endeavour and conclude the trial positively within a period of nine (09) months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. If the trial is not concluded within nine months, the petitioner will be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail.
7. With the aforesaid observation, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is once again rejected.
(Khatim Reza, J) Sankalp/- U T