Bundel Chauhan @ Bundela Chauhan @ Bunde Lal Chauhan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6860 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-65 Year-2022 Thana- NTPC District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

BUNDEL CHAUHAN @ BUNDELA CHAUHAN @ BUNDE LAL CHAUHAN SON OF LATE RAJENDRA CHAUHAN R/O VILL.- MOJAHIDPUR, P.S.- N.T.P.C., BARH, DISTT.- PATNA 2.

SUGIYA DEVI WIFE OF BUNDEL CHAUHAN @ BUNDELA CHAUHAN @ BUNDE LAL CHAUHAN R/O VILL.- MOJAHIDPUR, P.S.- N.T.P.C., BARH, DISTT.- PATNA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Tej Narayan Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bharat Bhushan, App, 156 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 13-04-2023 Heard the parties.

Learned counsel for the petitioners filed a supplementary affidavit in the Court. Let the same be accepted and kept on record.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation against the petitioners is that they killed the daughter of informant on the pretext of non-fulfillment of demand for dowry.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6860 of 2023(2) dt.13-04-2023 2/2 They have been falsely implicated in this case. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. There is no specific overt act against the petitioners. The petitioners are the in-laws of the deceased. He further submits that the husband of the deceased is already in judicial custody, which is mentioned in supplementary affidavit as well. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with N.T.P.C. P.S. Case No.65 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T