Patna High CourtCWJC/13751/2017disposed

Ranjit Prasad Yadav And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-02-26Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13751 of 2017 ======================================================

1. Ranjit Prasad Yadav, Son of Nawal Kishor Prasad Yadava, Resident of Village+P.O.- Rupchandra, P.S.- Sahebganj, District- Muzaffarpur.

2. Kumari Pratima, Wife of Sri Sunil Kumar Bhakta, Resident of VillageDaha Chhapra, P.S.- Sahebganj, District- Muzaffarpur.

3. Heera Paswan, Son of Sri Lachhu Paswan, Resident of VillageRajwara, P.S.- Sahebganj, District- Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Old Secretariat, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Human Resources Development, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Principal Secretary, Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms, Governments of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Director, Primary Education Department of Human Resources Development, Government of Bihar, Patna.

5. The Director, Mass Education Department of Human Resources Development, Government of Bihar, Patna.

6. The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Smt. Shilpa Singh-Ga12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 26-02-2018 The parties are in agreement that the present writ petition can be disposed of in terms of the order dated 03.03.2017 passed in CWJC No.384 of 2017 and analogous cases and the judgment of the learned Division Bench dated 23.01.2018 passed in LPA No.1047 of 2017.

Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of in terms of the aforesaid two orders passed in the writ petition

Patna High Court CWJC No.13751 of 2017 (2) dt.26-02-2018 2/2 and the L.P.A.

The State Government should take steps in the light of the aforesaid two judgments and redress the grievances of the petitioner herein.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) N.H./- U