Ranjan Kumar @ Ranjan Ray v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9491 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-93 Year-2021 Thana- BANGARA District- Samastipur ====================================================== RANJAN KUMAR @ RANJAN RAY, aged about 43 years, Gender-Male, S/o Sonelal Ray, R/o Village- Basti Khoajpur, P.S.- Baligaon, Distt- Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Ashutosh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Mr. Ganesh Prasad Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-04-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with N.H. Bangra P.S. Case No. 93 of 2021 for the offence registered under Sections 272, 273 of the I.P.C. and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that total 54 liters wine is said to have been recovered from the Tempo in question.

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. He has falsely been implicated in the present case. There is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9491 of 2023(2) dt.20-04-2023 2/3 no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. It is alleged that total 54 liters wine is recovered from the Tempo in question. The petitioner is named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner has transpired in the present case as the petitioner is alleged to be the owner of the said Tempo in question. It is further submitted that the petitioner has already sold the said Tempo in question to one Santosh Kumar on 15.09.2019 and to the effect that a statement has also been made in paragraph no. 8 of the present bail application. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner.

The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr. P.C. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon the order dated 13.04.2022 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Criminal Appeal No. 626 of 2022, arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 3005 of 2022 (Sweta Kumari-Versus-The State of Bihar).

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9491 of 2023(2) dt.20-04-2023 3/3 On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/ Complaint Case. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, Excise, Samastipur, in connection with N. H. Bangra P.S. Case No. 93 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Sudhir Singh, J) U.K./- U T