← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/1803/2024disposed

Bansh Narayan Paswan Alias Vansh Narayan Paswan Alias Vash Narayan Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2024-04-29Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1803 of 2024 ====================================================== Bansh Narayan Paswan Alias Vansh Narayan Paswan Alias Vash Narayan Paswan Son of Late Amar Dayal Ram Resident of Village- Paharpur, Police station- Shivsagar, District- Rohtas (Sasaram). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Home Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The District Magistrate, Rohtas, Sasaram.

3.

The Block Development Officer, Shivsagar, District- Rohtas. 4.

The Circle Officer, Shivsagar, District- Rohtas. 5.

The Officer in Charge, Shivsagar Police Station, District- Rohtas. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Surendra Kumar Choubey, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Government Pleader 22 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 29-04-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- "1(i). Issuance of a writ in the nature of writ of mandamus directing the respondent authorities to issue duplicate Arms Licence/fresh licence in favour of petitioner taking into consideration that petitioner's Arms licence has been lost during travelling from his village to Sasaram.

(ii). Issuance of a writ in the nature of writ of mandamus directing the respondents to renewal of licence from year 2020 to till date which has been not made by the concerned official.

(iii). Issuance of a writ in the nature of writ of mandamus directing the respondents to pass the

Patna High Court CWJC No.1803 of 2024(2) dt.29-04-2024 2/2 order to the representation made by the petitioner on 24.05.2023 regarding the issuance of 2nd copy of Arms Licence."

2.

After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to approach the Respondent No. 2, i.e. the District Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram, for redressal of his aforesaid grievances. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

It is needless to state that in case, appropriate application is filed in the requisite format before the Respondent No. 2, within a period of two weeks from today, the Respondent No. 2 shall take appropriate action thereon, forthwith. 4.

The present writ petition stands disposed off. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U