Raman Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5585 of 2018 =========================================================== Raman Kumar, Son of Gajendra Sharma, Resident of Village- Kamtaul, P.S.- Kamtaul, District- Darbhanga.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary, Excise Department, Govt. of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna.
2. The District Magistrate, Madhubani.
3. The Superintendent of Police, Madhubani
4. The S.H.O., Madhwapur Police Station, Madhubani .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gagan Deo Yadav For the Respondent/s : Mr. KUMAR MANISH- SC5 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 28-03-2018 This writ petition has been filed for release of a vehicle (T.V.S. Apache Motorcycle) bearing Registration No. BR-07AB2110 which has been seized in connection with Madhwapur P.S. Case No. 78 of 2017 due to violation of the Excise Act. The prayer made in the writ petition is to release the vehicle in question pending finalization of the confiscation proceedings and criminal case, if any, or the confiscation proceedings proposed to be initiated against the petitioner.
It is common ground that in various cases, identical in nature, pending finalization of the confiscation proceedings vehicles have been directed to be released by this Court on various conditions
Patna High Court CWJC No.5585 of 2018 dt.28-03-2018 2/2 and we see no reason to make a deviation in the present case. Keeping in view the aforesaid, it is directed that pending finalization of the aforesaid confiscation proceedings and criminal case, the aforesaid vehicle in question shall be released to the petitioner, on his furnishing two surety bonds to the satisfaction of District Magistrate, Madhubani, and further undertaking to produce the vehicle as and when directed by the authority concerned and not to alienate or deal with the vehicle in question or create a third party interest during the pendency of the confiscation proceedings and criminal case or prejudice the right of the State in confiscation proceeding. The aforesaid vehicle shall be released within one week from the date of furnishing of the sureties.
With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands allowed and disposed of.
(Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Dilip, AR AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 31.03.2018 Transmission Date N/A